Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 22.06.2025 05:43
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
General framework bridges quantum thermodynamics and non-Markovianity - Phys.org
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Which branch of engineering is better: ECE or Civil?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
The Ocean Is Getting Darker, Threatening All That Lives Within - ScienceAlert
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Exactly When Apple Will Launch iPhone 17 And iPhone 17 Pro - Forbes
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
How did you respond to, "Why do you love me"?
Thank you.
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years: